depricated scaleTier and added a new field scaleType#16922
depricated scaleTier and added a new field scaleType#16922raazanand wants to merge 11 commits intoGoogleCloudPlatform:mainfrom
Conversation
|
Googlers: For automatic test runs see go/terraform-auto-test-runs. @c2thorn, a repository maintainer, has been assigned to review your changes. If you have not received review feedback within 2 business days, please leave a comment on this PR asking them to take a look. You can help make sure that review is quick by doing a self-review and by running impacted tests locally. |
|
Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes: Diff reportYour PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.
|
Tests analyticsTotal tests: 42 Click here to see the affected service packages
Action takenFound 3 affected test(s) by replaying old test recordings. Starting RECORDING based on the most recent commit. Click here to see the affected tests
|
|
🟢 Tests passed during RECORDING mode: 🟢 No issues found for passed tests after REPLAYING rerun. 🔴 Tests failed during RECORDING mode: 🔴 Errors occurred during RECORDING mode. Please fix them to complete your PR. |
|
Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes: Diff reportYour PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.
|
Tests analyticsTotal tests: 42 Click here to see the affected service packages
Action takenFound 2 affected test(s) by replaying old test recordings. Starting RECORDING based on the most recent commit. Click here to see the affected tests
|
|
🟢 Tests passed during RECORDING mode: 🟢 No issues found for passed tests after REPLAYING rerun. 🔴 Tests failed during RECORDING mode: 🔴 Errors occurred during RECORDING mode. Please fix them to complete your PR. |
|
Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes: Diff reportYour PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.
|
Tests analyticsTotal tests: 42 Click here to see the affected service packages
Action takenFound 1 affected test(s) by replaying old test recordings. Starting RECORDING based on the most recent commit. Click here to see the affected tests
|
|
🔴 Tests failed during RECORDING mode: 🔴 Errors occurred during RECORDING mode. Please fix them to complete your PR. |
|
Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes: Diff reportYour PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.
|
Tests analyticsTotal tests: 42 Click here to see the affected service packages
Action takenFound 1 affected test(s) by replaying old test recordings. Starting RECORDING based on the most recent commit. Click here to see the affected tests
|
|
Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes: Diff reportYour PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.
|
|
Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes: Diff reportYour PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.
|
Non-exercised tests🔴 Tests were added that are skipped in VCR:
Tests analyticsTotal tests: 0 Click here to see the affected service packages
🔴 Errors occurred during REPLAYING mode. Please fix them to complete your PR. View the build log |
Non-exercised tests🔴 Tests were added that are skipped in VCR:
Tests analyticsTotal tests: 0 Click here to see the affected service packages
🔴 Errors occurred during REPLAYING mode. Please fix them to complete your PR. View the build log |
|
Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes: Diff reportYour PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.
|
Non-exercised tests🔴 Tests were added that are skipped in VCR:
Tests analyticsTotal tests: 0 Click here to see the affected service packages
🔴 Errors occurred during REPLAYING mode. Please fix them to complete your PR. View the build log |
|
Hi there, I'm the Modular magician. I've detected the following information about your changes: Diff reportYour PR generated some diffs in downstreams - here they are.
|
Tests analyticsTotal tests: 42 Click here to see the affected service packages
Action takenFound 2 affected test(s) by replaying old test recordings. Starting RECORDING based on the most recent commit. Click here to see the affected tests
|
| description: | | ||
| The scale type of the storage pool. Defaults to `SCALE_TYPE_DEFAULT` if not specified. | ||
| enum_values: | ||
| - 'SCALE_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For consistency with other enums in netapp_storage_pool, I am keeping SCALE_TYPE_UNSPECIFIED.
#ref: #16473 (comment)
c2thorn
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
looks like a merge conflict needs to be resolved. LGTM otherwise.
Co-authored-by: Cameron Thornton <camthornton@google.com>
This commit introduces the ability to specify a scale type for NetApp Storage Pools.
Changes include:
scaleTypeenum field togoogle_netapp_storage_pool. The scale type of the storage pool. Defaults toSCALE_TYPE_DEFAULTif not specified.