Make process easier by helping people uploading the timeline?

[arthurvr]

Right now it's still complex ya know.

Save timeline to machine -> upload on dropbox or whatever service -> try to get the raw url -> drop in extension -> get back URL you need. Requires too much effort IMHO.

Ideas on how to make things easier are def. welcome. Doesn't block publicizing at all but nice to have an issue to throw ideas in.

[Garbee]

Well, we need to not centralize hosting yet... People should get their services API key (or we can automate it with GDrive) and plug that in for hosting. But, getting it auto-uploaded is one huge step.

With Google Drive it needs to be shared publicly to anyone on the web (no problem.) Then you take the item ID and plug it in here:

https://e9e681cdfc83aceb7ee3d5297a19b999501cb520.googledrive.com/host/{ITEMID}

That gives you a link to one of the drive buckets. Not sure actually if it will always work or if it is just my item happens to be stored there. Doing no subdomain gives you one redirect which is to a bucket.

Ideally we could get an API added to DevTools (if not already existing) that allows you to tap the timeline for export so you can do what you want with the stream. Take the stream, push to user-selected provider, then use the services API to get the URL for the item and plug it in automatically to provide only the URL for showing off the timeline back.

[arthurvr]

Well, we need to not centralize hosting yet... People should get their services API key (or we can automate it with GDrive) and plug that in for hosting. But, getting it auto-uploaded is one huge step.

Yes, that's what I was thinking about. Hosting it would be out of scope and there are a bunch of services that exist already and can help us with this. Totally agree!

[arthurvr]

Ideally we could get an API added to DevTools (if not already existing) that allows you to tap the timeline for export so you can do what you want with the stream.

I don't think that this exists atm but would love to see it happen. Sounds like it's something other extensions would benefit from as well.

[Garbee]

Could we take advantage of the Google Drive Web Component perhaps? This could solve one case for uploading easily.

[paulirish]

okay!

1. upload trace to drive
2. permissions set to anyone on the internet can find and comment
3. get ID
4. plug ID into this magical URL
   • https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B7K1Uipy0SbDdDQ2TE9PV2ZuYnM&export=download
5. plus that into the full URL
   • chrome-devtools://devtools/bundled/devtools.html?remoteFrontendUrl=chrome-devtools://devtools/remote/serve_rev/@194187/inspector.html&loadTimelineFromURL=https://docs.google.com/uc?id=0B7K1Uipy0SbDdDQ2TE9PV2ZuYnM&export=download

That's the one.

[Garbee]

Step six: Order pizza

[paulirish]

as mentioned on IRC, ALL dropbox uploads can have CORS so they have the advantage mentioned here: https://github.com/arthurvr/timeline-url/issues/9#issuecomment-120666064

[kdzwinel]

To use Drive API user has to be logged in. How about using gists?

EDIT: I guess the only issue with gists is the maximum file size. It's not documented, so I asked them directly - waiting for response.

[paulirish]

@arthurvr do you wanna look into gists or dropbox?

[arthurvr]

do you wanna look into gists or dropbox?

Sure.

To use Drive API user has to be logged in. How about using gists?

Well, the user might not need to be logged in but there will need to be some auth at least. What percentage of the developers would have a GitHub account? I'm not really sure myself but I suspect there are people out there using devtools that don't have one. WDYT?

@kdzwinel Side: You don't (never) get a response from GitHub on Twitter :)

[paulirish]

well theres not gonna be a catchall solution for handling traces that everyone has an account for.

but i agree the gh, dbox, and gdrive are the three best candidates.

gh gists seems great, though i would only do it first if they do cors. (or if rawgit can proxy w cors)

[kdzwinel]

@arthurvr Not sure what do you mean by:

there will need to be some auth

we need no auth to create anonymous gists:

You can read public gists and create them for anonymous users without a token;

---

You don't (never) get a response from GitHub on Twitter :)

Yeah, it looks you are right ;) I've sent them an email.

[kdzwinel]

Got response from github:

1. does CORS?

Yes, it does. See https://developer.github.com/v3/#cross-origin-resource-sharing.

2. limits file size for anonymous gists (we need to support ~10MB JSON files)?

Yes it does. See https://developer.github.com/v3/gists/#truncation.

Gists are limited to 1MB, so we can't, unfortunately, use them :(

[paulirish]

ouch yeah.​ 1mb will not work for us. 5 would though. (we can do json.gz export and import) dayum.